DURING the December 2009 Annual General Meeting it was
suggested
that we write to the various authorities and
government bodies to express our concern at the
continued total lack of any effective action to
protect or conserve this historic Grade II listed
Nantwich Walled Garden.
This letter, it was agreed, should also specifically
draw the local authorities' attention to the serious
health and safety risk of masonry from the crumbling
three-metre-high walls falling onto pedestrians walking
along the adjacent Byron Walk footpath or onto children
playing around the base of the unprotected walls.
The letter was sent to Cheshire East Council and English
Heritage on the 17th of January 2010.
Following a lack of response from Cheshire East Council
several reminders were issued to the Chief Executive and
one of these elicited a response on October 22, 2010. As
usual, the general response of the council was to
dismiss all of our points and concerns.
It was noticed that the disappearance of sections of the
lower five courses of the wall in at least three areas
had left large sections of the 400-year-old north
wall unsupported and in imminent danger of collapsing
onto the adjacent footpath. The society sent a further
letter to both Cheshire East Council and Nantwich Town
Council.
Once again, Cheshire East dismissed all of our concerns
and the town council just reiterated the Cheshire East
Council's response that this crumbling and partially
unsupported wall presented absolutely no risk to the
public using the adjacent footpath.
A letter to the Local Government Ombudsman did, however,
produced a much better response and they decided to take
it up as a complaint against the council.
The resulting letter from the Ombudsman to the Cheshire
East Council produced a sort of response. But, in the
Ombudsman's most recent response to us (dated February
24, 2011), the Ombudsman confirmed that the council's
initial response had necessitated the Ombudsman to raise
further questions for council officers to answer. These
additional questions were promptly emailed to the
council and the Ombudsman, therefore, hoped to have an
answer within a week or so.
IN the absence of any other developments on the walled
garden and the imminent possibility of receiving a
decision from the Ombudsman on this latest complaint, it
was decided (towards the end of 2010) that
we should delay that year's AGM until we were able to
confirm the final decision from the Ombudsman.
Unfortunately, this decision has been delayed
awaiting the response from Cheshire East Council to the
Ombudsman.
lWE didn't hold a 2010
AGM, but we hope to have a meeting of members in the
near future.