|
After being consulted by the former Crewe and Nantwich
Borough Council, English Heritage gave this advice
(edited):
THE application affects the former walled garden of Townsend House,
which was built in 1580 for Richard Wilbraham, a wealthy town person with
court connections. Whilst the house has regrettably been lost, the walled
garden is a rare national survival of a late 16th century urban garden
structure, and notwithstanding its dilapidated condition, it deserves to
be fully repaired and conserved.
English Heritage was consulted on an earlier application for development
of the walled garden in 2004, when we recommended that the site should not
be developed with buildings, but should be repaired as part of the wider
development of Kingsley Farm. The application was refused on the grounds
that it was detrimental to the special interest of the listed structure
and that no justification had been presented why development within the
walled garden was required. The new application involves a
less intensive scheme, but the need for development and its impact on the
setting of the listed structure remain the fundamental issues of concern.
It is our view that development of the walled garden is undesirable in
view of its special interest. Regarding the impact that
the proposed development has on its special interest, it should be
considered that the listed structure is not merely a wall, but a wall
enclosing a space. The space was designed to be open and used for
recreation and amenity. Its size, proportions and layout are an important
aspect of its significance, and the construction of a substantial building
within the space would have a major and adverse impact.
Whilst the setting of the wall has been damaged to some degree by the
development to the north and west, the walled garden still survives as a
substantial historic structure behind the original burgage plots on Welsh
Row, and should be retained as an entity. We would
therefore support the rejection of this application, and the service of an
appropriate legal notice to secure the repair of the wall.
English
Heritage declined to list the
garden as being of historic interest, saying there was no plan of the
garden or traces of its layout on the ground. They also declined to
become involved in our project.
ON THIS WEBSITE:
Opening pages |
AGM |
Background | English
Heritage | The
garden | History |
Inaugural
meeting | Intent |
Join us | Links |
News | Photos |
Press coverage | The story so far |
Support | Who's
who? |